Table 5.
Covariates |
Adults who gave e- cigarettes as gifts |
Multivariable regression model# |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N | Weighted percentage# | Chi-square test# | Adjusted OR | (95% CI) | p value | ||
Gender | Male | 34 | 1.3% | 1.93; p =.165 | Referent |
||
Female | 0 | 0.0% | - | ||||
Age | 18–39 | 12 | 2.3% | 21.82***; p <.001 | Referent |
||
40–54 | 20 | 1.8% | 1.05 | (0.49, 2.25) | 0.909 | ||
55+ | 2 | 0.2% | 0.07 | (0.01, 0.38)** | 0.002 | ||
Income level | Low | 1 | 0.5% | 1.78, p =.620 | Referent |
||
Middle | 13 | 1.2% | 2.72 | (0.28, 26.73) | 0.392 | ||
High | 15 | 1.2% | 2.72 | (0.27, 27.06) | 0.393 | ||
Not stated | 5 | 1.9% | 4.36 | (0.38, 49.65) | 0.235 | ||
Education | Low | 0 | 0.0% | 5.74; p =.057 | – | ||
Medium | 23 | 1.1% | Referent |
||||
High | 11 | 1.8% | 0.94 | (0.45, 1.97) | 0.865 | ||
Cigarette smoking intensity | Light smoker | 17 | 1.3% | 1.66; p =.437 | Referent |
||
Moderate smoker | 12 | 0.9% | 0.51 | (0.25, 1.06) | 0.071 | ||
Heavy smoker | 5 | 1.6% | 0.65 | (0.24, 1.78) | 0.399 | ||
Attitude about cigarettes being good gifts | Negative | 19 | 0.9% | 7.53*; p =.023 | Referent |
||
Neutral | 5 | 1.0% | 1.03 | (0.40, 2.67) | 0.949 | ||
Positive | 10 | 2.3% | 2.94 | (1.35, 6.39)** | 0.007 | ||
Cigarette gifting experience | No | 14 | 0.9% | 3.73; p =.054 | Referent |
||
Yes | 20 | 1.6% | 1.32 | (0.63, 2.73) | 0.464 | ||
Harm perception of e-cigarettes | Don’t know | 9 | 0.6% | 15.25***; p <.001 | Referent | ||
Less harmful than cigarettes | 20 | 2.3% | 1.30 | (0.54, 3.09) | 0.559 | ||
Equally/more harmful than cigarettes | 5 | 1.4% | 1.07 | (0.35, 3.28) | 0.905 | ||
Ever use of e-cigarettes | No | 16 | 0.7% | 62.60***; p <.001 | Referent | ||
Yes | 18 | 5.6% | 6.78 | (3.05, 15.08)*** | <0.001 |
Note: *p <.05; **p <.01; ***p <.001.
Calculation was based on the ITC China Survey rescaled weights.