Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 16;42(11):2205–2220. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1285-21.2021

Table 1.

Variables tested to account for average coupling strength in the gastric network

Variable type Variable name n Min Max Mean Median Std t p BF
Personal Gender f = 32, m = 31 0.48 0.634 0.2799
BMI 63 17.5 24.5 21.0 21.0 1.8 0.52 0.604 0.0000
State anxiety (STAI B) 60 20 53 32.9 31.5 8.7 0.47 0.643 0.1240
Experimental Time of day (minutes since midnight) 63 581 1100 812 771 150 0.10 0.919 0.1325
Time since last meal (h) 52 1 8 4.0 3.5 2.0 1.24 0.220 0.0853
Frame-wise displacement (mm) 63 0.061 0.323 0.123 0.111 0.052 0.64 0.527 0.2635
Physiologic EGG frequency (Hz) 63 0.041 0.057 0.048 0.049 0.004 0.60 0.550 0.0000
EGG power (µv2) 63 6 3056 281 107 479 0.18 0.858 0.0000
EGG cycle duration variability (s) 63 1 6.5 3 2.8 1.4 0.93 0.357 0.0605
LF-HRV power (ms2) 52 0.5*−105 4.5*−105 9.5*−105 0.7*−105 0.7*−105 3.76 0.0004 3099
HF-HRV power (ms2) 52 0.4*−105 3.3*−105 5.5*−105 0.3*−105 0.5*−105 0.04 0.962 0.1463
LF/HF HRV ratio 52 0.339 8.15 2.51 1.91 1.97 1.87 0.067 0.3234

For each variable tested, the table displays the descriptive statistics, t values, uncorrected p values, and Bayes factors (BFs), for which values smaller than 0.33 indicates substantial evidence for the null hypothesis. Gender effects were assessed by comparing males and females with an unpaired sample t test, all other variables were assessed using robust linear regressions. Bold font indicates significant differences from the null distribution for p values and substantial evidence for the null hypothesis for bayes factors.