Skip to main content
. 2015 Oct 5;1(3):94–102. doi: 10.1136/bmjstel-2015-000058

Table 2.

Qualitative summary of key provider performance and patient complications for JiT versus no JiT training

Study (year) Provider/learner Procedure Provider performance Patient complications
Measure(s) Favours Measure(s) Favours
Scholtz et al19 (2013) Nurses Central venous catheter dressing change Corrective prompts JiT Central line-associated blood stream infections JiT
Nishisaki et al10 (2010) Paediatric and emergency residents Endotracheal intubation
in PICU
Success rate Equivocal Tracheal intubation-associated events Equivocal
Kessler et al16 (2015) Paediatric and emergency residents Infant lumbar puncture Success rate Equivocal
Calatayud et al15 (2010) Surgical residents Laparoscopic cholecystectomy OSATS7 JiT
Lee et al9 (2012) Urology residents Laparoscopic radical and partial nephrectomy, dismembered pyeloplasty, renal cyst decortication Vassiliou Scale Equivocal
Chen et al7 (2013) Obstetric and gynaecological residents Laparoscopic hysterectomy and adnexal/tubal surgery OSATS6, Vassiliou Scale,
Kundhal Scale
JiT
Moldovanu et al17 (2011) Attending surgeon Laparoscopic cholecystectomy OSATS3, Vassiliou Scale2 JiT
Mucksavage et al18 (2012) Attending surgeon Laparoscopic partial and radical nephrectomies Surgical time JiT EBL, Narcotic use, LOS, change in creatinine, ischaemic time Equivocal

For each study, the preceding provider performance/patient complication measure was used to determine the predominant finding in the favours column (JiT, equivocal, no JiT).

–, not reported; EBL, estimated blood loss; JiT; just-in-time; LOS, length-of-stay; OSATS, Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skill (subscript indicates dimensions studied); PICU, paediatric intensive care unit; subscripts indicate dimensions studied.