Table 2.
Summary of participant peer-rated TAS subscale analysis for simulation-based Team Training of Inter-Professional Students: scenario 1 versus scenario 2
TAS subscales | Scenario 1 | Scenario 2 | ||||||||
N | Mean* | SD | Cronbach’s alpha | N | Mean* | SD | Cronbach’s alpha | Change† | p Value‡ | |
TBB§ | 509 | 6.09 | 4.86 | 0.725 | 509 | 5.89 | 2.39 | 0.473 | −0.20 | 0.400 |
SMM** | 509 | 4.70 | 1.02 | 0.952 | 509 | 5.49 | 0.67 | 0.937 | 0.79 | <0.001 |
ACR¶ | 509 | 5.51 | 6.86 | 0.713 | 509 | 5.74 | 3.95 | 0.505 | 0.24 | 0.443 |
*Mean combined score of third year medical and senior undergraduate nursing students.
†Scenario 2—scenario 1.
‡One-way ANOVA.
§TBB, Team-Based Behaviors, subscale assessing individual performance (five items; multisource evaluation).
**SMM, Shared Mental Model, subscale of overall teamwork (three items).
¶ACR, Adaptive Communication and Response, subscale of overall teamwork (three items).
ANOVA, analysis of variance; TAS, Teamwork Assessment Scales.