Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 27;7(5):360–365. doi: 10.1136/bmjstel-2020-000685

Table 3.

Multivariable model prediction between the Teamwork Assessment Scales (TAS) Subscales and the Objective Structured Assessment of Debriefing (OSAD) items with subsequent univariate analysis

TAS subscale TBB scores SMM scores ACR scores
OSAD items Multivariable model‡ P value Univariate analysis P value Multivariable model‡ P value Univariate analysis P value Multivariable model‡ P value Univariate analysis P value
Prebrief*
 Approach −0.08570 0.7216 0.21922 0.0714 −0.09995 0.7631 0.23391 0.1407 −0.32721 0.2560 0.16339 0.2661
 Environment 0.06062 0.7932 0.11709 0.2577 0.24958 0.4364 0.16771 0.2098 0.21718 0.4300 0.15226 0.2155
 Engagement 0.12304 0.6149 0.16471 0.1714 0.08976 0.7897 0.19771 0.2060 0.16727 0.5634 0.17361 0.2274
Debrief†
 Approach −0.09134 0.7628 0.22074 0.1863 −0.32172 0.4431 0.11518 0.5986 −0.45763 0.2083 0.12341 0.5390
 Environment 0.00374 0.9890 0.07585 0.6381 −0.14264 0.7041 0.00502 0.9809 0.09889 0.7588 0.10581 0.5813
 Engagement 0.84096 0.0794 0.36114 0.0552 1.00136 0.1267 0.31094 0.2097 1.45665 0.0130 0.37508 0.0967
 Reaction −0.20660 0.5784 0.21860 0.1851 −0.29717 0.5622 0.13788 0.5230 −0.38255 0.3865 0.16726 0.3981
 Reflection −0.48221 0.3191 0.00330 0.9886 −0.66129 0.3217 −0.03132 0.9164 −0.78257 0.1755 −0.06944 0.8000
 Analysis −0.31957 0.5076 −0.11259 0.6410 −0.05431 0.9346 −0.09752 0.7554 −0.23248 0.6827 −0.12190 0.6716
 Diagnosis 0.78778 0.1021 0.11326 0.5910 0.83410 0.2042 0.06251 0.8192 0.79181 0.1616 −0.00492 0.9844
 Application −0.35443 0.3859 −0.08307 0.6354 −0.36848 0.5118 −0.09371 0.6798 −0.32147 0.5047 −0.10831 0.6035

*N=38 events among six faculty team combinations.

†N=38 events among seven faculty team combinations.

‡Multiple linear regression analysis.

ACR, adaptive communication and response; SMM, shared mental model; TBB, team-based behaviours.