Impact |
Does the message state the concrete impact of donating? |
A concrete measure of the averted carbon dioxide emissions per dollar donated. |
A statement that emissions are averted, but with no concrete measure. |
A statement that emissions are averted, but with no concrete measure. |
Motives |
Does the message invoke altruistic or self-interested motives? |
A statement that a donation will help preserve the environment. |
A statement that a donation will help preserve the environment. |
A statement that a donation will give a feeling of satisfaction. |
Endorsement |
Is the charity endorsed by an authority figure? |
An endorsement by a policy researcher from a well-known university. |
An endorsement by a policy researcher from a well-known university. |
No endorsement by an authority figure. |
Co-benefits |
Does the message mention positive side effects of donating? |
A statement that donations also increase employment in developing countries. |
No mention of positive side effects of donating. |
No mention of positive side effects of donating. |
Frame |
Is the message framed in terms of climate or a different issue? |
Framed in terms of climate change. |
Framed in terms of climate change. |
Framed in terms of air pollution and its impact on human health. |
Proximity |
Does the message focus on consequences of the issue that are nearby in space and time? |
Emphasis of consequences in the same country and year of the study. |
Emphasis of consequences in a different continent and future century. |
Emphasis of consequences in a different continent and future century. |
Social norms |
Does the message mention how the reader’s peers feel about the issue? |
A statement that university students are concerned about the issue. |
No mention of university students. |
No mention of university students. |
Growing risk |
Does the message emphasize that the issue is increasing in severity? |
A statement that the risk is growing more urgent each year. |
No mention of the growing risk. |
No mention of the growing risk. |