Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 21;8:40. doi: 10.1186/s40798-022-00431-0

Table 2.

Risk of bias overall judgment

Study Risk of bias
Blazevich et al. [49] Some concerns
Burgess et al. [37] High risk
Coratella, et al. [50] Low risk
Correa et al. [60] Some concerns
Fouré et al. [36] Some concerns
Fouré, et al. [38] Some concerns
Fouré et al. [18] High risk
Fouré et al. [59] High risk
Franchi et al. [51] High risk
Grosset, et al. [65] High risk
Helland et al. [52] High risk
Hirayama et al. [63] Some concerns
Hoffrén-Mikkola et al. [121] High risk
Horiuchi et al. [66] High risk
Horwath et al. [53] Some concerns
Houghton et al. [25] Some concerns
Hunter and Marshall [67] Some concerns
Kannas et al. [17] High risk
Kijowksi et al. [68] Some concerns
Kubo et al. [28] Some concerns
Kubo et al. [54] Some concerns
Kubo et al. [61] Some concerns
Kudo et al. [55] Some concerns
Laurent et al. [27] High risk
Monti et al. [56] Some concerns
Ogiso and Miki [64] Some concerns
Paleckis et al. [26] High risk
Potach et al. [69] High risk
Stien et al. [57] Some concerns
Taube et al. [70] Some concerns
Ullrich et al. [58] Some concerns
Van der Zwaard et al. [62] Some concerns
Wu et al. [39] Some concerns
Zubac and Simunic [71] Low risk