Skip to main content
. 2011 Dec 7;2011(12):CD009052. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009052.pub2

Boylan 1996.

Methods Randomised clinical trial.
Participants Country: Canada. 
 Sample size: 45. 
 Post‐randomisation drop‐out(s): not stated. 
 Revised sample size: 45. 
 Females: not stated. 
 Mean age: 49.2 years. 
 Piggyback: not stated. 
 Conventional: not stated. 
 Cadaveric donor: not stated. 
 Live donor: not stated. 
 Inclusion criteria: 
 1. Primary isolated orthotopic liver transplantation between 1992 and 1994. 
 Exclusion criteria: 
 1. Patients with primary biliary cirrhosis or primary sclerosing cholangitis. 
 2. Predisposition to thrombotic tendency. 
 3. Fulminant liver failure.
Interventions The patients were randomised to the following groups. 
 Group 1: intervention (n = 25). 
 Further details: tranexamic acid 40 mg/kg/hour continuous infusion from induction of anaesthesia to unclamping of portal vein. maximum dose = 20 gram. 
 Group 2: control (n = 20). 
 Further details: normal saline.
Outcomes The outcomes reported were mortality, retransplantation, hospital stay, and transfusion requirements.
Notes Attempts were made to contact the author in September 2011.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Quote: "Study agents were prepared by the hospital pharmacy using a randomisation schedule provided in sealed envelopes".
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Quote: "Study agents were prepared by the hospital pharmacy using a randomisation schedule provided in sealed envelopes; all other personnel were blinded to randomisation status". 
 Comment: Probably adequate allocation concealment, although details of the sealed envelope such as whether they were opaque and consecutively numbered were not available.
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Quote: "Study agents were prepared by the hospital pharmacy using a randomisation schedule provided in sealed envelopes; all other personnel were blinded to randomisation status". 
 Comment: Normal saline was used as placebo.
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Quote: "Study agents were prepared by the hospital pharmacy using a randomisation schedule provided in sealed envelopes; all other personnel were blinded to randomisation status". 
 Comment: Normal saline was used as placebo.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Comment: In a preliminary report, the authors had excluded two patients out of 30 patients.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) High risk Comment: Important outcomes were not reported.
Vested interest bias Unclear risk Comment: This information was not available.