Skip to main content
. 2011 Dec 7;2011(12):CD009052. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009052.pub2

Frenette 1998.

Methods Randomised clinical trial.
Participants Country: USA. 
 Sample size: 30. 
 Post‐randomisation drop‐out(s): not stated. 
 Revised sample size: 30. 
 Females: not stated. 
 Mean age: 49.5 years. 
 Piggyback: not stated. 
 Conventional: not stated. 
 Cadaveric donor: not stated. 
 Live donor: not stated. 
 Inclusion criteria: 
 1. Patients undergoing orthotopic liver transplantation. 
 2. Age more than 18 years. 
 3. Patients having a reaction time (R‐time) more than 15 minutes. 
 Exclusion criteria: 
 1. Patients already taking oestrogen therapy. 
 2. Received blood products in preparation for surgery. 
 3. Patients undergoing retransplantation.
Interventions The patients were randomised to the following groups. 
 Group 1: intervention (n = 15). 
 Further details: conjugated oestrogen 100 mg intravenous when the reaction time was longer than 15 minutes at the beginning of surgery and 30 minutes after reperfusion of the new graft. 
 Group 2: control (n = 15). 
 Further details: placebo (equal volume of normal saline).
Outcomes The outcomes reported were blood transfusion requirements.
Notes Attempts were made to contact the author in September 2011.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Quote: "Study drugs were prepared by the hospital pharmacy using a randomisation schedule; all other personnel were blinded to the randomisation. The researchers were informed about the contents of the blinded syringes after the study".
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Quote: "Study drugs were prepared by the hospital pharmacy using a randomisation schedule; all other personnel were blinded to the randomisation. The researchers were informed about the contents of the blinded syringes after the study".
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Quote: "Study drugs were prepared by the hospital pharmacy using a randomisation schedule; all other personnel were blinded to the randomisation. The researchers were informed about the contents of the blinded syringes after the study".
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Quote: "Study drugs were prepared by the hospital pharmacy using a randomisation schedule; all other personnel were blinded to the randomisation. The researchers were informed about the contents of the blinded syringes after the study".
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Comment: This information was not available.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) High risk Comment: Important outcomes were not reported.
Vested interest bias Unclear risk Comment: This information was not available.