Skip to main content
. 2011 May 11;2011(5):CD008063. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008063.pub2

Comparison 3. MI versus assessment and feedback.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Extent of substance use 7   Std. Mean Difference (Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
1.1 Short f‐u 7 986 Std. Mean Difference (Random, 95% CI) 0.12 [‐0.01, 0.24]
1.2 Medium f‐u 2 265 Std. Mean Difference (Random, 95% CI) 0.38 [0.10, 0.66]