Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cognit Ther Res. 2021 Feb 17;46(1):146–160. doi: 10.1007/s10608-021-10212-w

Table 4.

Study 3 Incremental validity of response-based scores predicting SAD

Logistic regression models: Single attention-bias score as predictor Logistic regression models: Traditional and response-based scores as simultaneous predictors (controlling for gender)
Current SAD Lifetime SAD Current SAD Lifetime SAD
OR 95% CI OR 95% CI IVs OR 95% CI OR 95% CI
ABTrad 2.04* 1.13 3.67 1.37* 1.03 1.82 -- -- -- --
OrientationTrad 1.83* 1.02 3.29 1.19 0.90 1.58 -- -- -- --
DisengagementTrad 1.23 0.87 1.73 1.16 0.88 1.52 -- -- -- --
Fast ABRB 1.49* 1.06 2.10 1.27t 0.97 1.65 ABTrad 1.22 0.83 1.79 1.27 0.93 1.72
Fast ABRB 1.35 0.95 1.91 1.13 0.84 1.15
Slow ABRB --i -- 0.82 0.64 1.06 ABTrad 1.48* 1.04 2.10 1.41* 1.07 1.87
Slow ABRB 0.75* 0.56 1.00 0.76* 0.59 0.99
Fast OrientRB 1.36t 0.97 1.9 1.25 0.96 1.63 OrientationTrad 1.02 0.71 1.47 1.08 0.80 1.46
Fast OrientRB 1.33 0.94 1.88 1.20 0.89 1.60
Slow OrientRB --i -- 0.91 0.7 1.17 OrientationTrad 1.21 0.85 1.72 1.21 0.91 1.60
Slow OrientRB 0.81 0.60 1.09 0.87 0.67 1.13
Fast DisengageRB 0.75t 0.55 1.04 0.87 0.67 1.14 DisengagementTrad 1.31 0.95 1.81 1.20 0.91 1.57
Fast DisengageRB 0.72* 0.53 0.98 0.85 0.65 1.11
Slow DisengageRB 1.61* 1.14 2.26 1.42* 1.08 1.87 DisengagementTrad 1.05 0.75 1.47 1.04 0.79 1.37
Slow DisengageRB 1.56* 1.13 2.15 1.39* 1.06 1.84

Note.

*

p<.05

t

p<.01

i

model did not converge, Trad = Traditional, RB=Response-based computation. Odds-Ratios presented in the right side of the table are controlling for gender and include respective traditional and response-based score in same model.