Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cytometry B Clin Cytom. 2020 Oct 5;100(4):497–508. doi: 10.1002/cyto.b.21961

Table 5.

Comparison of gating strategies used for detecting plasma cells after treatment with daratumumab and elotuzumab

Gating parametersa Fold change (SD)b
Untreated 10 μg/mL daratumumab 100 μg/mL elotuzumab 10 μg/mL daratumumab & 100 μg/mL elotuzumab
A. Approach 1        
CD38, CD138, CD45 1.00 (0)b 0 (0) 1.06 (0.09) 0 (0)
p-value - < 0.001 NS < 0.001
B. Approach 2
CD319, CD138, CD45 1.00 (0.11) 1.01 (0.07) 1.05 (0.09) 0.75 (0.24)
p-value NS NS NS NS
C. Approach 3
CD38/CD319, CD138, CD45 1.03 (0.12) 0.96 (0.03) 1.00 (0.04) 0.79 (0.33)
p-value NS 0.086 NS NS
a

All cells were pre-gated using Time vs. FSC-A, FSC-A vs. FSC-H, and FSC-A vs. SSC-A to identify hematopoietic cells that are valid, singlet, and viable.

b

Untreated plasma cells characterized by CD38br, CD138+, CD45lo was considered as the reference population; all analyses were normalized to this population.

NS: not significant.