Table 5.
Comparison of gating strategies used for detecting plasma cells after treatment with daratumumab and elotuzumab
| Gating parametersa | Fold change (SD)b |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Untreated | 10 μg/mL daratumumab | 100 μg/mL elotuzumab | 10 μg/mL daratumumab & 100 μg/mL elotuzumab | |
| A. Approach 1 | ||||
| CD38, CD138, CD45 | 1.00 (0)b | 0 (0) | 1.06 (0.09) | 0 (0) |
| p-value | - | < 0.001 | NS | < 0.001 |
| B. Approach 2 | ||||
| CD319, CD138, CD45 | 1.00 (0.11) | 1.01 (0.07) | 1.05 (0.09) | 0.75 (0.24) |
| p-value | NS | NS | NS | NS |
| C. Approach 3 | ||||
| CD38/CD319, CD138, CD45 | 1.03 (0.12) | 0.96 (0.03) | 1.00 (0.04) | 0.79 (0.33) |
| p-value | NS | 0.086 | NS | NS |
All cells were pre-gated using Time vs. FSC-A, FSC-A vs. FSC-H, and FSC-A vs. SSC-A to identify hematopoietic cells that are valid, singlet, and viable.
Untreated plasma cells characterized by CD38br, CD138+, CD45lo was considered as the reference population; all analyses were normalized to this population.
NS: not significant.