Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 26;31(3):529–539. doi: 10.1007/s00787-021-01727-4

Table 3.

The mediating effect of childhood adversity in the association between the schizophrenia polygenic risk score and childhood problem behaviour

Outcome Total effect Direct effect Mediated effect Proportion mediated
β (95% CI) P PFDR β (95% CI) P β (95% CI) P Estimate (95% CI) P
Generation R Study (N = 1901)
 Internalizing problems 0.06 (0.02;0.11) 0.01 0.05 (0.01;0.09) 0.02 0.01 (0.00;0.03) 0.05 0.22 (-0.01;0.65) 0.06
  Anxious/depressed 0.06 (0.02;0.10) 0.01 0.02 0.05 (0.00;0.09) 0.03 0.01 (0.00;0.03) 0.05 0.23 (0.00;0.77) 0.05
  Withdrawn/depressed 0.00 (− 0.04;0.04) 0.97 0.97 NA NA NA
  Somatic complaints 0.05 (0.01;0.10) 0.02 0.03 0.04 (0.00;0.09) 0.06 0.01 (0.00;0.02) 0.04 0.19 (− 0.02;0.83) 0.06
 Externalizing problems 0.04 (0.00;0.09) 0.06 NA NA NA
 Other problems scales
  Social problem 0.04 (− 0.01;0.08) 0.11 0.13 NA NA NA
  Thought problems 0.08 (0.04;0.12)  < 0.01  < 0.01 0.07 (0.03;0.11)  < 0.01 0.01 (0.00;0.02) 0.05 0.14 (0.00;0.34) 0.05
  Attention problems 0.07 (0.02;0.11)  < 0.01  < 0.01 0.05 (0.01;0.10) 0.01 0.01 (0.00;0.02) 0.04 0.19 (0.01;0.54) 0.04
ALSPAC cohort (N = 3447)
 SDQ Prosocial behaviour − 0.05 (− 0.09;− 0.02)  < 0.01 − 0.05 (− 0.08;− 0.02)  < 0.01 − 0.003 (− 0.01;0.00) 0.01 0.05 (0.01;0.16) 0.01

Note. Analyses are adjusted for age, child sex, and four principal components of genetic ancestry. Results are shown for the Pt < 0.5 inclusion threshold

NA  not applicable (due to the fact that the result was not significant in the total effect analyses)