Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 22;13:50. doi: 10.1186/s13244-022-01192-w

Table 2.

Summary estimates of sensitivity, specificity, DOR, LR+, LR−, SROC curve (AUC ± SE, Q* ± SE) of US and MRI for identification of PAS in different subgroup

Subgroup Sensitivity (%) (95% CI) Specificity (%) (95% CI) DOR (95% CI) LR + (95% CI) LR− (95% CI) SROC curve AUC ± SE SROC curve Q* ± SE

Prosp

[9, 10, 12, 17, 18, 20, 23, 24]

US 92 (87–96) 86 (81–90) 77 (27–220) 8.63 (3.21–23.16) 0.10 (0.06–0.18) 0.96 ± 0.01 0.90 ± 0.02
MRI 93 (88–97) 91 (87–94) 96 (24–385) 8.05 (3.79–17.11) 0.12 (0.05–0.25) 0.96 ± 0.02 0.91 ± 0.03

Retro

[11, 1316, 19, 21, 22, 25, 26]

US 88 (83–92) 80 (75–85) 24 (10–57) 3.55 (2.09–6.03) 0.21 (0.13–0.34) 0.90 ± 0.03 0.83 ± 0.03
MRI 85 (79–90) 82 (77–87) 21 (8–54) 4.09 (2.52–6.64) 0.22 (0.13–0.37) 0.89 ± 0.04 0.83 ± 0.04

Earlier studies

[917]

US 90 (83–94) 88 (83–92) 51 (16–161) 6.24 (2.40–16.24) 0.17 (0.10–0.28) 0.94 ± 0.02 0.88 ± 0.03
MRI 90 (84–95) 89 (85–93) 62 (13–305) 6.77 (2.68–17.11) 0.14 (0.06–0.33) 0.97 ± 0.01 0.92 ± 0.02

Recent studies

[1826]

US 90 (85–94) 79 (74–84) 32 (13–78) 4.38 (2.68–7.15) 0.16 (0.09–0.27) 0.91 ± 0.04 0.84 ± 0.04
MRI 88 (82–92) 85 (80–88) 30 (13–67) 5.00 (3.79–6.6) 0.19 (0.11–0.32) 0.90 ± 0.02 0.83 ± 0.02

US, ultrasonography; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; PAS, placenta accrete spectrum disorder; DOR, diagnostic odds ratio; LR+, positive likelihood ratios; LR−, negative likelihood ratios; SROC, summary receiver operating characteristic; AUC, area under the SROC curve; SE, standard error