Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 22;12:4853. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-08949-9

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Anti-CD80/86 antibodies suppress T lymphocyte proliferation in mixed lymphocyte reaction assay. Representative flow cytometry plots of CD4+ (a) CFSE-labeled cells. (b) The frequency of CD4+ CFSElow cells in CD4+ T cells was significantly reduced in the allogeneic stimulation group with anti-CD80/86 antibodies compared with that in without anti-CD80/86 antibodies group (n = 3, ***P < 0.001). (c) Representative columns of BrdU assay results. Anti-CD80/86 suppressed T cell proliferation compared to without anti-CD80/86 antibodies in allogeneic stimulation and no allogeneic stimulation (n = 3, **P = 0.007, *P = 0.019, respectively). (d) Representative flow cytometry plots of the frequency of IFN-γ+CD4+ T lymphocyte with or without allogeneic stimulation and anti-CD80/86 intervention. (e) Frequency of IFN-γ+CD4+ T lymphocyte in CD4+ T cells reduced following treatment with anti-CD80/86 antibodies compared with that without anti-CD80/86 antibody treatment in allogeneic stimulation (n = 3, * P < 0.001). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. CFSE carboxyfluorescein diacetate succinimidyl ester.