Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 8;8(1):e19379. doi: 10.2196/19379

Table 2.

Sources of information found to be important (N=447).

Source of information Ranking Population-based (n=233), n (%) OCC (n=214), n (%) P value

Population-based OCCa


Medical oncologist 1 1 212 (91) 189 (88.3) .35
Oncology nurse 2 3 154 (66.1) 154 (72) .71
Internet for information 3 2 126 (54.1) 171 (79.9) <.001
Family 4 6 120 (51.5) 84 (39.2) .009
Friends 5 7 115 (49.4) 76 (35.5) .003
General practitioner 6 5 100 (42.9) 94 (43.9) .83
Children 7 11 97 (41.6) 65 (30.4) .01b
Other patients 8 4 60 (25.8) 107 (50) <.001b
Other patients via the internet 15 10 17 (7.3) 68 (31.7) <.001b
Group discussions with patients 17 8 13 (5.6) 70 (32.7) <.001b
Colleagues 11 15 41 (17.6) 32 (15) .45b
Pharmacist 9 14 48 (20.6) 40 (18.7) .61b
Newspapers or television 9 12 49 (21) 63 (29.4) .04
Books 11 8 41 (17.6) 71 (33.2) <.001
Second-opinion physician 13 13 20 (8.6) 56 (26.2) <.001
Alternative counselor 14 17 18 (7.7) 30 (14) .03
Home care nurse 15 15 16 (6.9) 32 (15) .006

aOCC: online cancer community.

bA relatively large difference in ranking (≥4).