Table 2.
Questionnaire responses.
| Patients (n = 42) | Assistants (n = 35) | Urologists (n = 54) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| From 1-5 where 1 = “very bad” and 5 = “very good” | |||
| How do you rate the image quality? | 5 (4-5) | 5 (4-5) | 3 (3-3) |
| How do you rate the sound quality? | 5 (4-5) | 5 (4-5) | 5 (5-5) |
| How do you rate the robot's mobility? | — | — | 5 (5-5) |
| From 1-5 where 1 = “strongly disagree” and 5 = “strongly agree” | |||
| We succeeded in having a natural conversation | 4 (4-5) | 5 (4-5) | 5 (5-5) |
| I felt safe through the conversation | 5 (4-5) | 5 (5-5) | — |
| I was able to convey the patient's treatment plan | — | 5 (5-5) | 5 (5-5) |
| I was able to assess the color of the urine | — | — | 5 (5-5) |
| NR: 29 | |||
| NA: 1 | |||
| I was able to assess the ultrasound image | — | — | 5 (4-5) |
| NR: 45 |
Numbers are median (IQR). NR: not relevant; NA: not available.