Shoskes 2005.
Methods |
|
|
Participants | Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: NS |
|
Interventions |
|
|
Outcomes |
|
|
Notes | Follow‐up: 30 days | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Randomisation method not described |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | No information provided regarding the concealment of allocation |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | "Patients were randomized in a blinded fashion to receive either the Oxy‐Q or placebo". No additional information provided |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Withdrawals reported, intention‐to‐treat and per‐protocol analyses reported |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | Study protocol is not separately available, however, the published report includes all expected outcomes |
Other bias | High risk | Control group had a higher proportion of men (71%) compared with the 2 intervention groups (50%). Funding: not stated. Bioflavonoid preparation Oxy‐Q (Farr Labs, Santa Monica, CA) |