Singh 2000.
Methods |
|
|
Participants | Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
|
|
Interventions |
|
|
Outcomes |
|
|
Notes | Follow‐up: 28 days | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | The randomisation system used in this study may be insufficient, it was not stated how the random sequence was generated. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Randomisation achieved through the selection of sealed envelopes. Patients were asked to select one of two cards (A or B) which were enclosed in sealed envelopes. Study does not specify whether these were opaque |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Study reported the use of double blinding and stated that the physicians examining the patients and technicians analysing the blood were blinded to treatment allocation. Study reports the use of placebo |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Outcomes reported on all patients |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Study protocol is not separately available, however, all expected outcomes were included |
Other bias | Unclear risk | Funding: financial support from the Centre of Nutrition Tishcon Corporation, Westbury, NY provided coenzyme Q10 |