Skip to main content
. 2012 Oct 17;2012(10):CD008176. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008176.pub2

Singh 2000.

Methods
  • Study design: parallel RCT

  • Time frame: NS

Participants Inclusion criteria
  • Setting: single centre

  • country: India

  • CKD on dialysis or advised to have dialysis

  • Number: treatment group (11); control group (10)

  • Mean age ± SD: treatment group (43.7 ± 10.2); control group (44.2 ± 8.7)

  • Sex (M/F): treatment group (8/3); control group (7/3)


Exclusion criteria
  • AKI; obstructive uropathy; cancer; seriously ill patients with marked acidosis or shock

Interventions
  • Treatment group

    • Coenzyme Q (2 capsules 3 times daily, 30 mg each)

  • Control group

    • Placebo (inert fibre cellulose; 2 capsules 3 times daily, 500 mg each)

Outcomes
  • SCr

  • Mean change in GFR

Notes Follow‐up: 28 days
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk The randomisation system used in this study may be insufficient, it was not stated how the random sequence was generated.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Randomisation achieved through the selection of sealed envelopes. Patients were asked to select one of two cards (A or B) which were enclosed in sealed envelopes. Study does not specify whether these were opaque
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Study reported the use of double blinding and stated that the physicians examining the patients and technicians analysing the blood were blinded to treatment allocation. Study reports the use of placebo
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Outcomes reported on all patients
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Study protocol is not separately available, however, all expected outcomes were included
Other bias Unclear risk Funding: financial support from the Centre of Nutrition
Tishcon Corporation, Westbury, NY provided coenzyme Q10