Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 2;10(2):e02107-21. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.02107-21

TABLE 2.

dRAST versus reference method for Gram-negative bacteria from prospective clinical blood culture samplesa

Antibiotic Total tested S I R VME (%) ME (%) mE (%) % CA
Amikacin 124 121 3 0 0 (0.0) 2 (1.7) 3 (2.4) 96.0
Cefotaxime 119 104 1 14 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 100.0
Ceftazidime 122 106 1 15 0 (0.0) 3 (2.8) 4 (3.3) 94.3
Ciprofloxacin 124 95 6 23 1 (4.3) 1 (1.1) 7 (5.6) 92.7
Gentamicin 124 116 1 7 1 (14.3) 0 (0.0) 3 (2.4) 96.8
Imipenem 120 118 2 0 0 (0.0) 1 (0.8) 3 (2.5) 97.5
Meropenem 124 123 1 0 0 (0.0) 1 (0.8) 1 (0.8) 98.4
Piperacillin/Tazobactam 122 104 1 17 12 (70.6) 2 (1.9) 3 (2.5) 86.1
Trimethoprim/Sulfamethoxazole 121 90 0 31 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 1 (0.8) 99.2
ESBL 109 94 0 15 2 (13.3) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 98.2
Overall 1209 1071 16 122 16 (13.1) 10 (0.9) 25 (2.1) 95.9
a

S, susceptible; I, intermediate; R, resistant; ESBL, extended spectrum β-lactamase-producing; VME, very major error; ME, major error; mE, minor error; CA, categorical agreement. Percentage VME and ME were calculated based on the number of resistant and susceptible isolates, respectively.