Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 23;17(3):e0264233. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264233

Table 2. ANOVA analysis of foot dimensions for NWB, HWB, and 80%WB groups.

Foot Dimensions (mm) Mean (Standard Deviation) HWB vs NWB (%) 80%WB vs NWB (%) 80%WB vs HWB (%)
NWB HWB 80%WB
Male (N1 = 19)
FL 243.2 (8.8) 246.1 (8.2) 246.2 (8.2) 1.2% 1.2% 0.0%
HL 72.7 (4.2) 71.9 (4.1) 71.9 (4.3) -1.2% -1.1% 0.1%
BL 179.5 (7.1) 182.6 (6.9) 182.6 (6.9) 1.7% 1.7% 0.0%
FW 85.7 (5.9) 93.8 (5.9) 93.9 (5.9) 9.4% 9.6% 0.2%
BW 88.2 (5.7) 96.9 (5.8) 97.1 (5.8) 9.9% 10.1% 0.2%
BMW 67.7 (3.8) 70.1 (3.8) 70.2 (3.8) 3.5% 3.7% 0.2%
BG 233.5 (11.9) 241.9 (12.0) 242.0 (12.0) 3.6% 3.7% 0.0%
IG 237.7 (10.8) 244.4 (11.0) 244.4 (11.0) 2.8% 2.8% 0.0%
LHD 341.8 (13.8) 351.9 (14.6) 351.9 (14.6) 3.0% 3.0% 0.0%
SHD 315.1 (14.0) 323.6 (14.5) 323.6 (17.2) 2.7% 2.7% 0.0%
IH 68.0 (5.0) 58.5 (5.1) 58.5 (5.1) -13.9% -13.9% 0.0%
NH 49.2 (8.2) 41.9 (6.8) 41.9 (6.8) -14.7% -14.8% 0.0%
Female (N2 = 29)
FL 231.3 (9.7) 234.3 (10.1) 234.4 (10.1) 1.3% 1.3% 0.0%
HL 67.7 (5.3) 66.7 (5.2) 66.7 (5.1) -1.4% -1.5% -0.1%
BL 168.8 (7.9) 171.8 (8.0) 171.8 (8.0) 1.8% 1.8% 0.0%
FW 82.7 (5.2) 90.7 (6.1) 90.9 (6.1) 9.7% 9.8% 0.2%
BW 84.7 (5.0) 93.5 (6.2) 93.6 (6.2) 10.4% 10.6% 0.2%
BMW 62.7 (3.6) 65.5 (3.8) 65.6 (3.8) 4.3% 4.6% 0.2%
BG 221.4 (10.6) 231.5 (12.2) 231.6 (12.2) 4.6% 4.6% 0.0%
IG 222.5 (11.5) 228.8 (12.1) 228.9 (12.1) 2.8% 2.9% 0.0%
LHD 320.0 (13.3) 329.2 (14.4) 329.3 (14.4) 2.9% 2.9% 0.0%
SHD 297.3 (13.7) 306.6 (14.6) 306.6 (14.6) 3.1% 3.2% 0.0%
IH 64.1 (4.3) 53.9 (3.6) 53.9 (3.6) -15.9% -16.0% 0.0%
NH 47.6 (6.1) 37.9 (5.4) 37.8 (5.4) -20.5% -20.5% -0.1%

a Groups with significant differences at the 0.05 level are bolded.