Table 4. ANOVA analysis and change percentage of contact area for NWB, HWB, and 80%WB groups.
| Contact area (CA) Unit: mm2 | Mean (Standard Deviation) | HWB vs NWB (%) | 80%WB vs NWB (%) | 80%WB vs HWB (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NWB | HWB | 80%WB | ||||
| Male (N1 = 19) | ||||||
| Forefoot | 3359.5 (342.7) | 3573.0 (363.6) | 3687.6 (352.8) | 6.4% | 9.8% | 3.2% |
| Midfoot | 3098.3 (467.4) | 3391.8 (543.6) | 3514.9 (533.6) | 9.5% | 13.4% | 3.6% |
| Rearfoot | 2388.5 (295.1) | 2748.5 (267.6) | 2848.5 (256.6) | 15.1% | 19.3% | 3.6% |
| Female (N2 = 29) | ||||||
| Forefoot | 3100.1 (417.0) | 3344.8 (386.1) | 3488.8 (427.1) | 7.9% | 12.5% | 4.3% |
| Midfoot | 2683.6 (529.4) | 3038.6 (745.5) | 3211.2 (817.0) | 13.2% | 19.7% | 5.7% |
| Rearfoot | 2037.1 (238.6) | 2484.0 (301.2) | 2565.7 (334.0) | 21.9% | 25.9% | 3.3% |
a Groups with significant differences at the 0.05 level are bolded.