Table 1.
Victims’ characterization (N = 1 488)
| Victims’ characterization |
n (%) |
P* | |
|---|---|---|---|
| G1 (n = 1 258) |
G2 (n = 230) |
||
| Age (years) | |||
| ≥16–20 | 22 (1.8) | 5 (2.2) | 0.477 (0.463) |
| 21–30 | 215 (17.1) | 41 (17.8) | |
| 31–40 | 404 (32.1) | 86 (37.4) | |
| 41–50 | 378 (30.1) | 55 (23.9) | |
| 51–60 | 149 (11.8) | 27 (11.7) | |
| 61–64 | 27 (2.2) | 6 (2.6) | |
| ≥ 65 | 44 (3.5) | 5 (2.2) | |
| Missing | 19 (1.5) | 5 (2.2) | – |
| Relationship with the alleged offender | |||
| Past | 217 (17.2) | 31 (13.5) | 0.189 (0.189) |
| Current | 1 041 (82.8) | 199 (86.5) | |
| Married | 786 (62.5) | 141 (61.3) | n.a. |
| In-union | 250 (19.9) | 57 (24.8) | |
| Dating | 5 (0.4) | 1 (0.4) | |
| Employment status | |||
| Unemployed | 475 (37.8) | 79 (34.4) | 0.392 (0.422) |
| Employed | 463 (36.8) | 97 (42.2) | |
| Retired | 80 (6.4) | 13 (5.7) | |
| Others | 58 (4.6) | 8 (3.5) | |
| Missing | 182 (14.5) | 33 (14.4) | – |
| Economical dependency | |||
| Yes | 339 (27.0) | 61 (26.5) | 0.821 (0.934) |
| No | 834 (66.3) | 146 (63.5) | |
| Missing | 85 (6.8) | 23 (10.0) | – |
* P values presented for both imputed (former) and raw models (latter) with there were missing data.