Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 21;298(4):101761. doi: 10.1016/j.jbc.2022.101761

Table 1.

Enzymatic parameters showing the comparison of SbCPR2s

CPR type Cytochrome c reduction
C3′H reduction
C4H reduction
Substrate
Cytochrome c
NADPH
p-Coumaroyl shikimic acid
2-Naphthoic acid
KM (μM) Vmax (min−1)a KM (μM) Vmax (min−1)a KM (μM) Vmax (min−1)a KM (μM) Vmax (min−1)a
SbCPR2a 26.6 ± 3.3 2438.2 ± 99.7 5.3 ± 0.5 940.9 ± 22.8 69.6 ± 7.0 163.9 ± 69.6 1.6 ± 0.3 6.0 ± 0.3
SbCPR2b 48.9 ± 7.8 2432.8 ± 159.7 8.9 ± 1.0 950.7 ± 29.5 47.1 ± 6.6 369.8 ± 22.1 2.3 ± 0.4 30.1 ± 1.7
SbCPR2c 48.6 ± 11.5 3460.7 ± 337.4 14.9 ± 3.1 992.0 ± 14.9 186.8 ± 48.8 387.0 ± 66.5 0.3 ± 0.1 17.4 ± 0.9
a

Velocity was normalized by enzyme concentration.