Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 22;46:101354. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101354

Table 2.

Distribution of 138 included studies reporting costs associated with VI and its major causes by super-region, study participants age-range, study design, perspective of analysis and epidemiological approach.

Studies characteristics General VI studies
Condition-specific studies
Total
n % n % n %
Number of super-regions estimates (n = 147)a
 High Income 30 70% 66 63% 96 65%
 South Asia 2 5% 8 8% 10 7%
 Southeast Asia, East Asia, and Oceania 3 7% 5 5% 8 5%
 Latin America and Caribbean 1 2% 6 6% 7 5%
 Sub-Saharan Africa 1 2% 6 6% 7 5%
 Central Europe, Eastern Europe, and Central Asia 1 2% 2 2% 3 2%
 North Africa and Middle East 0 0% 2 2% 2 1%
 Global 5 12% 9 9% 14 10%
Study participants age-range (n = 138)
 All ages 21 55% 16 16% 37 27%
 Youth, Adults and Seniors (all > 15 years) 16 42% 64 64% 80 58%
 Children and Youth only (all < 20 years) 1 3% 3 3% 4 3%
 Age range not stated 0 0% 17 17% 17 12%
Study design (n = 138)
 Cost of illness study 28 74% 56 56% 84 61%
 Cost analysis 4 11% 24 24% 28 20%
 Cost effectiveness study 0 0% 17 17% 17 12%
 Other b 6 16% 3 3% 9 7%
Study perspective (n = 138)c
 Societal 21 55% 27 27% 48 35%
 Healthcare system 4 11% 21 21% 25 18%
 Third party payer 1 3% 22 22% 23 17%
 Patient 7 18% 7 7% 14 10%
 Hospital 0 0% 7 7% 7 5%
 Other d 4 11% 2 2% 6 5%
 Multiple e 0 0% 11 11% 11 8%
 Not applicable f 1 3% 3 3% 4 3%
Study epidemiological approach (n = 138)
 Prevalence-based 34 89% 90 90% 124 90%
 Incidence-based 3 8% 5 5% 8 6%
 Incidence and prevalence-based 0 0% 3 3% 3 2%
 Not applicable f 1 3% 2 2% 3 2%
a

Studies reported costs estimates in more than one super-region therefore the sum of studies distributed by super-region (n = 147) is greater than the number of studies (n = 138);

b

Includes 4 case control studies, 2 case reports, 1 study reporting each of a method to collect personal costs, employment data and data on informal care;

c

We assigned a study perspective in 52 studies when authors had not;

d

Includes studies adopting a governmental (n = 4), caregiver (n = 1) and employer (n = 1) perspective;

e

Includes economic evaluation results from 2 perspectives, most often (societal or healthcare system perspective together (n = 3) or combined with other perspectives (n = 6). Other combinations included patient perspective reported with other perspectives (n = 2);

f

These studies reported an estimate of the impact of vision impairment on the labour market in terms of well-being and thus did not require a study perspective or an epidemiological approach.