Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 24;65(6):936–948. doi: 10.1007/s00125-022-05679-5

Table 2.

Scale measures for the complete HARPdoc cohort

Variable n Total score Mean item score
HFS-II, total score 97 51.2 ± 26.1 1.6 ± 0.8
HFS-II, behaviour 97 21.1 ± 11.9 1.4 ± 0.8
 HFS behaviour score <1.85, n (%) 97 73 (75.3)
HFS-II, worry 97 30.2 ± 16.3 1.7 ± 0.9
 HFS worry score <0.92, n (%) 97 20 (20.6)
HFS factor, ran high 97 6.2 ± 3.6 1.6 ± 0.9
HFS factor, sought safety 97 13.8 ± 8.0 1.7 ± 1.0
HFS factor, felt restricted 93 6.5 ± 5.9 1.1 ± 1.0
HFS factor, worry 96 20.2 ± 12.2 1.6 ± 1.0
A2A, total score 97 10.0 ± 5.4 0.8 ± 0.5
A2A, hyperglycaemia avoidance prioritised 97 5.9 ± 2.7 1.5 ± 0.7
A2A, hypoglycaemia concern minimised 97 2.5 ± 1.9 0.6 ± 0.5
A2A, asymptomatic hypoglycaemia normalised 97 1.7 ± 2.2 0.4 ± 0.6
PAID score 96 31.9 ± 20.1
 ≥40 (severe diabetes distress), n (%) 96 30 (31.3)
HADS-A score 97 7.5 ± 4.6
 0–7 (normal), n (%) 97 49 (50.5)
 8–10 (borderline abnormal), n (%) 97 22 (22.7)
 11–21 (abnormal), n (%) 97 26 (26.8)
HADS-D score 97 5.9 ± 4.3
 0–7 (normal), n (%) 97 63 (64.9)
 8–10 (borderline abnormal), n (%) 97 20 (20.6)
 11–21 (abnormal), n (%) 97 14 (14.4)
HARPdoc clusters
 High fear/low barriers, n (%) 97 29 (29.9)
 Low fear/high barriers, n (%) 97 68 (70.1)

Data are presented as mean ± SD or n (%)