Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 23;157(5):406–413. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2022.0290

Table 3. Multivariable Analysis of Patient and Surgeon Factors and Conversation Characteristics Related to OPTION5 Scores.

Characteristic Effect estimate (95% CI) P value
Patient age, y 0.22 (−0.04 to 0.46) .009
Patient gender
Male 1 [Reference] NA
Female −0.06 (−3.68 to 3.45) .97
Patient educational level
Some college or less 1 [Reference] NA
College degree or higher −2.67 (−6.16 to 0.71) .13
Surgeon age, y −0.25 (−0.70 to 0.20) .30
Surgeon gender
Male 1 [Reference] NA
Female −2.28 (−11.16 to 6.60) .63
Surgical indication
Vascular 1 [Reference] NA
Oncologic 0.16 (−8.46 to 8.81) .97
Final treatment decision
No surgery planned 1 [Reference] NA
May consider surgerya 6.97 (0.34 to 13.45) .04b
Surgery planned −1.40 (−8.22 to 5.16) .68
Transcript audio length, min 0.69 (0.52 to 0.88) <.001b
Reluctance to operate
No 1 [Reference] NA
Yes 5.80 (1.09-10.52) .02b

Abbreviations: NA, not applicable; OPTION5, 5-domain Observing Patient Involvement in Decision-making scale.

a

During group adjudication of OPTION5 scores, coders assessed the final treatment decision based on the content of the recorded consultation. The response “may consider surgery” was used to indicate consultations when surgery was discussed but not definitely planned (eg, awaiting additional workup or discussion with tumor board) or when surgery was being considered in the future.

b

Statistically significant at P < .05.