Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 17;23(4):e136–e161. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jeab292

Table 8.

Major studies evaluating the diagnostic performance of CCTA at patient level for the detection of obstructive CAD (coronary stenosis ≥ 50%) in TAVI candidates

Trial Pontone et al.131 Andreini et al.126 Hamdan et al.127 Harris et al.  128 Opolski et al.130 Matsumoto et al.129 Rossi et al.132 Strong et al.133
Sample size 60 325 115 100 475 60 140 200
Prevalence of obstructive CAD (%) 43 N/A 43 73 57 40 41 34
Sensitivity (95% CI) 88 (76–100) 89a 96a 98 (92–100) 98 (95–99) 91a 91 (81–96) 100 (94–100)
Specificity (95% CI) 88 (77–99) 90a 73a 55 (35–74) 37 (30–44) 58a 54 (44–65) 42 (33–50)
PPV (95% CI) 85 (72–99) 80a 72a 85 (76–92) 67 (62–72) 59a 58 (48–68) 47 (44–51)
NPV (95% CI) 91 (81–100) 95a 96a 93 (69–99) 94 (86–98) 91a 90 (78–95) 100 (92–100)
Coronary stents included + + + + + - - -
CABG included + + + + + - - -
a

95% confidence intervals not reported in the original study.

CABG, coronary artery by-pass graft; CAD, coronary artery disease; CI, confidence intervals; N/A, not available; NPV, negative predictive value; PPV, positive predictive value.