Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 21;10:e12947. doi: 10.7717/peerj.12947

Table 2. Quality assessments of M1AP models from five different algorithms.

Initial and comparison models were not assessed after being processed with molecular dynamics (MD) simulations whereas further and variant models were assessed after being subjected to MD simulations for a time period specified at the end of the model name (e.g., 450ns).

Model VERIFY3D2 ERRAT3 PROVE4 PROCHECK5 WHATCHECK6
Aa1% with score ≥0.2 AOQF1% BOPA1% Aa% in MFR1 Aa% in AAR1 Aa% in GAR1 Aa% in DR1 G-Factor # of SCP1 with pass # of SCP with warning # of SCP with error Overall report
Initial Models
GalaxyWeb 69.25 74.07 8.1 89.1 8.4 1.7 0.8 0.05 26 15 4 Pass
I-TASSER 47.36 90.47 7.5 60.8 31.7 4.7 2.8 –0.77 19 18 10 Pass
Phyre2 56.98 22.99 10.4 76.0 14.6 5.1 4.3 –0.60 27 12 7 Pass
PRIMO 39.66 1.35 33.4 58.4 25.1 9.2 7.3 –1.41 23 15 8 Pass
RaptorX 41.32 43.72 9.1 78.6 17.8 1.9 1.7 –0.42 23 16 7 Pass
Robetta 76.23 95.22 4.8 83.9 15.6 0.3 0.2 0.11 27 14 6 Pass
Robetta-domain 89.06 88.24 4.4 85.2 13.9 0.5 0.4 0.20 27 15 5 Pass
Comparison Model
AlphaFold2 89.55 63.21 4.4 80.9 14.3 3.5 1.3 –0.14 22 17 6 Pass
Further Models
GalaxyWeb_100ns 88.30 78.35 7.1 84.6 13.7 1.1 0.6 –1.11 17 21 8 Pass
Robetta-domain_100ns 83.89 87.53 6.6 87.1 10.7 1.3 0.9 –1.11 17 21 8 Pass
GalaxyWeb_450ns 80.75 85.38 5.9 89.1 9.4 1.3 0.2 –1.05 17 22 7 Pass
Variant Models
GalaxyWeb_Ser50Pro_450ns 79.62 87.45 8.5 88.0 9.2 2.4 0.4 –1.10 16 22 8 Pass
GalaxyWeb_Arg266Gln_450ns 86.60 77.26 6.0 84.6 12.6 1.9 0.9 –1.14 16 20 10 Pass
GalaxyWeb_Gly317Arg_450ns 84.91 74.90 7.1 85.5 12.4 1.1 1.0 –1.09 18 20 8 Pass
GalaxyWeb_Pro389Leu_450ns 77.36 70.50 8.2 84.2 13.0 1.7 1.1 –1.11 16 21 9 Pass
GalaxyWeb_Leu430Pro_450ns 79.06 78.46 6.3 85.6 12.0 1.7 0.7 –1.09 18 20 8 Pass

Notes:

1

Aa, amino acid; AOQF, average overall quality factor; BOPA, buried outlier protein atoms; MFR, the most favored regions; AAR, additional allowed regions; GAR, generously allowed regions; DR, disallowed regions; SCP, stereochemical properties.

2

In VERIFY3D, at least 80% of aa in a protein should have a score ≥0.2 in the 3D–1D profile for a good quality.

3

In ERRAT, AOQF ≥95% indicates a good quality, AOQF around 91% indicates an average quality, and lower AOQF indicates a bad quality.

4

In PROVE, BOPA ≤1% indicates a good quality, BOPA between 1% and 5% indicates an average quality, and BOPA >5% indicates a bad quality.

5

In the Ramachandran plot analysis of PROCHECK, model has a good quality if overall G-factor is >–0.5 and ≥90% of aa in protein are in the most favored regions.

6

In WHATCHECK, SCP with pass refers to a good quality, SCP with warning indicates an average quality, and SCP with error refers to a bad quality. Of note, total number of SCP might vary from structure to structure.