Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 22;22(4):9. doi: 10.1167/jov.22.4.9

Table A2.

The Accuracy and stereoscopic depth constancy analyses independent of condition order.

Estimate DF t p R
Accuracy relative to theoretical
 PTE
  Near viewing distance
   Intercept −0.33 15 −0.46 0.65 0.12
   Slope −0.09 94 −0.63 0.53 0.06
  Far viewing distance
   Intercept −0.38 15 −0.60 0.56 0.15
   Slope −0.20 94 −1.53 0.13 0.16
 Stereoscope
  Near viewing distance
   Intercept 0.69 15 1.81 0.09 0.42
   Slope −0.20 126 −2.06 0.04 0.18
  Far viewing distance
   Intercept 0.55 15 1.60 0.13 0.38
   Slope −0.36 126 −4.70 <0.0001 0.39
 HMD
  Near viewing distance
   Intercept 1.41 15 2.61 0.02 0.56
   Slope −0.29 126 −2.68 0.01 0.23
  Far viewing distance
   Intercept 1.28 15 2.98 0.01 0.61
   Slope −0.44 126 −4.64 <0.0001 0.38
Stereoscopic depth constancy
 Viewing distance × apparatus: PTE
  Intercept −0.05 15 −0.20 0.84 0.05
  Slope −0.10 94 −2.18 0.03 0.19
 Viewing distance × apparatus: stereoscope
  Intercept −0.14 15 −0.89 0.39 0.22
  Slope −0.16 126 −4.26 <0.0001 0.35
 Viewing distance × apparatus: HMD
  Intercept −0.14 15 −0.80 0.44 0.20
  Slope −0.15 126 −5.79 <0.0001 0.46

Notes: The accuracy relative to theoretical analysis is comparing the intercept and slope of depth estimates in each apparatus and viewing distance relative to a theoretical observer with perfect accuracy. The stereoscopic depth constancy analysis is comparing the relative intercepts and slopes for the two viewing distances for each apparatus.