Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 8;12(6):678. doi: 10.3390/ani12060678

Table 1.

Variations in approaches to animal welfare legislation and recognition of animal sentience for the top three pork-producing countries, globally.

Pig Production Volume by Country and Associated Legislative Protection
Rank Country [36] Tonnes of Meat, Pig [36] Animal Welfare Legislation
on Transport, Slaughter, and Rearing
Recognition of Animal Sentience and
Veterinarian’s Role
1 China 41,133,300
  • The term “animal welfare” is not included in the present legislation [37]

  • Transport: Animal Husbandry Law 2005 [38,39]

  • Slaughter: Regulations on Administration of Hog Slaughter 1997 (revised 2007) [38]

  • No legislation specifically on rearing of pigs [38,40]

Animal sentience not formally recognized [40]
Veterinarians are not formally recognized as animal welfare advocates [41,42]
2 USA 12,845,097
  • Transport: Twenty-Eight hour Law [43,44]

  • Slaughter: Humane Slaughter Act [43,45]

  • No federal legislation specifically on rearing of pigs, but there are state by-laws [43]

Animal sentience is not formally recognized at the federal level, but there is legislation that recognizes suffering [43]
Veterinarians are responsible for the animal health and welfare [46]
3 Germany 5,118,000
  • Transport: Council Directive EC 1/2005 [47]

  • Slaughter: Council Directive EC No 1099/2009 [48]

  • Rearing of pigs: Regulation on the Protection of Farm Animals at federal level, Council Directive 2008/120/EC at EU level [49,50,51]

Animal sentience is recognized in the Lisbon Treaty
Veterinarians are responsible for animal health and welfare [52]