Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 17;11(3):401. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11030401

Table 2.

Statistical analysis for the performance of the best 9 SSMs on the target Main dataset.

Query Set * Nodes % Id Ac Correct Class Incorrect Class κ Sn Sp Ppos Pneg
H + sing 467 40 0.933 1215 87 0.866 0.877 0.989 0.988 0.89
50 0.935 1218 84 0.871 0.877 0.994 0.993 0.89
60 0.935 1218 84 0.871 0.874 0.997 0.996 0.888
W + sing 469 40 0.934 1216 86 0.868 0.879 0.989 0.988 0.891
50 0.936 1219 83 0.873 0.879 0.994 0.993 0.891
60 0.937 1220 82 0.874 0.877 0.997 0.997 0.89
H + W + sing 479 40 0.942 1226 76 0.883 0.894 0.989 0.988 0.903
50 0.944 1229 73 0.888 0.894 0.994 0.993 0.904
60 0.945 1230 72 0.889 0.892 0.997 0.997 0.903

* H is the set obtained when harmonic centrality was calculated, W is the set obtained when the weighted degree was calculated, and sing is the set of 99 outliers.