Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 7;12(3):409. doi: 10.3390/biom12030409

Table 8.

Overall training time cost comparison of CNN-XG, CRISPR-ONT, C-RNNCrispr and DeepHF on five datasets under 10-fold cross-validation.

Model ESP HF xCas SpCas9 Sniper
CNN-XG 694 601 470 456 725
CRISPR-ONT 4123 2700 2616 2170 2640
C-RNNCrispr 161,200 15,463 10,340 9266 10,410
DeepHF 37,860 36,287 24,289 19,320 24,018

The running time of C-RNNCrispr was derived from CRISPR-ONT [34].