Table 21.
Comparative observations of ICHIMP-SHO for three-bar truss optimisation design issue with other algorithms
| Comparative algorithms | Optimal values for variables | Optimum weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| X1 | X2 | ||
|
Proposed ICHIMP-SHO |
0.788595 | 0.408486 | 263.89701 |
| Hernandez | 0.788 | 0.408 | 263.9 |
| Ray and Saini [150] | 0.795 | 0.398 | 264.3 |
| Gandomi [151] | 0.78867 | 0.40902 | 263.9716 |
| EEGWO [76] | 0.790761722154339 | 0.402632303723429 | 2.6392442078878771E+02 |
| GWO-SA [152] | 0.789 | 0.408 | 263.896 |
| WDE [76] | 0.515535107819326 | 0.0156341500434795 | 2.639297829829848E+02 |
| ALO | 0.789 | 0.408 | 263.896 |
| CS [153] | 0.789 | 0.409 | 263.972 |
| hHHO-SCA [75] | 0.788498 | 0.40875 | 263.8958665 |
| DEDS [154] | 0.789 | 0.408 | 263.896 |
| CSA [155] | 0.788638976 | 0.408350573 | 263.895844337 |
| MBA [151] | 0.789 | 0.409 | 263.896 |
| Ray and Liew [156] | 0.788621037 | 0.408401334 | 263.8958466 |
| Raj et al. | 0.789764410 | 0.405176050 | 263.89671 |