Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 16;14(6):1526. doi: 10.3390/cancers14061526

Table 2.

Summary of main outcomes among systemic therapies (immunotherapy) approved for advanced HCC.

Study Year Published Phase Number of Patients Line of Tx Tx Control CR (%) ORR (%) mPFS (Months) mOS (Months) HR x (95% CI)
IMbrave 150 [23,24] 2018 III 501 First Atezolizumab + Bevacizumab Sorafenib 8 vs. 1 30 vs. 11 All: 6.8 vs. 4.3
HBV: 6.7 vs. 2.8
HCV: 8.8 vs. 5.8
Non-viral 7.1 vs. 5.6
All: 19.2 vs. 13.4
HBV: 19.0 vs. 12.4
HCV: 24.6 vs. 12.6
Non-viral: 17.0 vs. 18.0
All: 0.66 (0.52–0.85)
HBV: 0.58 (0.40–0.83)
HCV: 0.43 (0.25–0.73)
Non-viral: (0.68–1.63)
CheckMate 459 [19] 2021 III 743 First Nivolumab Sorafenib 4 vs. 1 16 vs. 7 3.8 vs. 3.9 16.4 vs. 14.7 * 0.85 (0.72–1.02)
KEYNOTE-240 [20] 2019 III 413 Second Pembrolizumab BSC 2 vs. 0 18 vs. 4 3.0 vs. 2.8 13.6 vs. 10.6 * 0.78 (0.61–1.00)
KEYNOTE-240 (Asian cohort) [49] 2019 III 157 Second Pembrolizumab BSC - 21 vs. 2 2.8 vs. 1.4 13.8 vs. 8.3 0.55 (0.37–0.80)
CheckMate 040 (cohort 4) + [21] 2020 I/II 50 Second Nivolumab + Ipilimumab - 8 32 - 22.2 -
CheckMate 040 (dose expansion cohort) [17] 2017 I/II 214 Mixed Nivolumab - 1 20 4.0 NR -
KEYNOTE-224 [18] 2018 II 104 Second Pembrolizumab - 1 17 4.9 12.9 -
Study 22 ++ [22] 2021 I/II 75 Second Tremelimumab + Durvalumab - 1 24 2.2 18.7 -
HIMALAYA [51] 2022 III 393 First Tremelimumab + Durvalumab Sorafenib 3 vs. 0 20 vs. 5 3.8 vs. 4.1 16.4 vs. 13.8 0.78 (0.65–0.92)

BSC: Best supportive care; CI: Confidence interval; HR: Hazard ratio; mOS: Median overall survival; mPFS: Median progression-free survival; NR: Not reached; ORR: Objective response rate; Tx: Treatment; * did not reach statistical significance; + results from the Nivolumab 1 mg/kg plus Ipilimumab 3 mg/kg Q4wk arm; ++ results from the T300+D arm; x HR for mOS.