Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 26;12(3):598. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12030598

Table 4.

Summary of the published ocular parameters differences between the two devices.

Anterion—IOLMaster 700 Mean Difference
Sample Size AL
(mm)
CCT
(μm)
ACD
(mm)
LT
(mm)
Kf
(D)
Ks
(D)
Km
(D)
WTW (mm) IOL Power (D)
Panthier C [7] 125 −0.01 −9 0.06 0.07 - - −0.11 −0.26 -
Shetty N [8] 127 −0.04 1.5 0.061 0.09 −0.15 −0.15 −0.15 −0.24 −0.19
Oh R [11] 47 −0.005 * 0.702 0.058 0.154 # −0.166 0.034 −0.059 - -
Tañá-Sanz P [12] 102 - −7.637 0.067 0.062 - - - −0.149 -
Tañá-Rivero [13] 49 −0.0044 −6.8 0.0615 −0.0591 −0.0307 −0.0435 - - -
Fişuş AD [14] 389 −0.01 −5.66 0.07 0.06 −0.14 −0.11 −0.11 - -
Pfaeffli OA [15] 78 −0.01 - 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.03 - −0.22 -

Note: ACD = anterior chamber depth; AL = axial length; CCT = central corneal thickness; D = diopter; IOL = intraocular lens; Kf = flat keratometry; Ks = steep keratometry; Km = mean keratometry; LT = lens thickness; WTW = white-to-white. * Forty-one eyes for comparison; # 44 eyes for comparison; - = no reported data in paper; [ ] = the reference number sequence corresponding to a reference number in the paper.