Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 20;9(3):437. doi: 10.3390/children9030437

Table 3.

Distribution of tooth agenesis code (TAC) by gender and cleft type.

000.000.000.000 (N = 87) 000.002.000.000 (N = 30) 002.000.000.000 (N = 18) 002.002.000.000 (N = 13) Other (N = 35) p Value
Sex 0.405 *
Women 38 (55.9%) 8 (11.8%) 6 (8.8%) 3 (4.4%) 13 (19.1%)
Men 49 (42.6%) 22 (19.1%) 12 (10.4%) 10 (8.7%) 22 (19.1%)
Orofacial cleft types 0.001 *
CLL 6 (100.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
CLP 19 (42.2%) 6 (13.3%) 3 (6.7%) 6 (13.3%) 11 (24.4%)
CLPL 34 (47.2%) 21 (29.2%) 3 (4.2%) 4 (5.6%) 10 (13.9%)
CLPR 19 (43.2%) 2 (4.5%) 12 (27.3%) 2 (4.5%) 9 (20.5%)
CP 9 (56.2%) 1 (6.2%) 0 (0.0%) 1 (6.2%) 5 (31.2%)

* Fisher’s exact test for count data with simulated p-value (based on 2000 replicates).