Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 17;11(6):1024. doi: 10.3390/cells11061024

Table A7.

Statistical analysis of EEG power theta/delta ratio during sleep.

♀ hTau and WT d14 and d45
Total N = 15
♀ hTau and WT
d14
Total N = 20
♂ hTau
d14 and d45
Total N = 7
ANOVA factor or interaction p value p value p value
Ab
(Pt-IgG vs. Ctrl-IgG)
0.293 0.194 0.934
Mouse Strain
(hTau vs. WT)
0.046 * 0.004 * N/A
Ab x Strain 0.132 0.098 N/A
SS
(NREM sleep vs. REM sleep)
<0.001 * <0.001 * 0.001 *
Ab x SS 0.330 0.331 0.947
Strain x SS 0.137 0.015 * N/A
Ab x Strain x SS 0.142 0.062 N/A
Time (d14 vs. d45) 0.036 * N/A 0.018 *
Ab x Time 0.595 N/A 0.753
Strain x Time 0.104 N/A N/A
Ab x Strain x Time 0.506 N/A N/A
Time x SS 0.117 N/A 0.063
Ab x Time x SS 0.535 N/A 0.460
Time x SS x Strain 0.249 N/A N/A
Ab x Time x SS x Strain 0.642 N/A N/A

ANOVA: analysis of variance, with “x” indicating interactions. Ab: antibody. SS: sleep state. N/A: not applicable. ♀ and ♂: female and male, respectively. The meaning of the other abbreviations is the same as in the main manuscript. *: statistically significant (P < 0.05). Experiments were performed on 4 ♀ WT with Pt-IgG at d14 and d45; 4 ♀ WT with Ctrl-IgG at d14, of which 3 also at d45; 7 ♀ hTau with Pt-IgG at d14, of which 4 also at d45; 5 ♀ hTau with Ctrl-IgG at d14, of which 4 also at d45; 4 ♂ hTau with Pt-IgG at d14 and d45; 3 ♂ hTau with Ctrl-IgG at d14 and d45.