Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 7;29(3):1773–1795. doi: 10.3390/curroncol29030146

Table 3.

Summary of AI applications for CRC treatment session (nCRT, neoadjuvant radiotherapy; ANN, artificial neural network; AUC, area under curve; KNN, K-nearest neighbors; SVM, support vector machine; NBC, naïve Bayesian classifier; MLR, mixed logistic regression; LR, logistic regression; NN, neural network; BN, Bayesian network; RF, random forest; CPT-11, Irinotecan; IC50, half maximal inhibitory concentration).

Topic Task Dataset Model Performance Year Ref.
nCRT nCRT response prediction Medical records from 282 patients (248 training and 34 validation) ANN, KNN, SVM, NBC, MLR ANN model outperformed others:
Accuracy: 0.88, AUC: 0.84, Sensitivity: 0.94
2020 [79]
nCRT response prediction 6555 patients’ records from the SEER LR 3-year OS rate: 92.4% with pCR; 88.2% without pCR 2019 [80]
nCRT response prediction 98 patients MRI (53 training set and 45 validation set) SVM, NN, BN, KNN Test: AUC: 97.8%,
Accuracy: 92.8%,
Validation: AUC: 95%,
Accuracy: 90%
2019 [81]
nCRT response prediction 55 patients MRI RF Mean AUC: 0.83 2019 [82]
Chemotherapy The toxicity of CPT-11 prediction Demographic data, liver function bloody tests and tumor markers from 20 advanced CRC patients SVM Accuracy: 91% for diarrhea,
76% for leukopenia,
and 75% for neutropenia
2019 [83]
Drug IC50 detection 18,850 organic compounds KNN, RF, SVM Accuracy: over 63% 2018 [84]