. 2022 Mar 9;24(3):386. doi: 10.3390/e24030386

Table A14.

Triple of simulated prediction coverage rates averaged over the five different covariance structures for the trigonometric model and $r = 30 %$ missing rates. The triple covers the sample sizes $(n_{1}; n_{2}; n_{3}) = (100, 500, 1000)$ using a significance level of $α = 0.05$ .

Coverage Rate for the Trigonometric Model with r = 30% Missings
Imputation Method	$P I_{n, e m p Q}$	$P I_{n, R e s V a r}$	$P I_{n, w e i g h t e d}$
missForest	$(0.9346; 0.9530; 0.9522)$	$(0.9516; 0.9608; 0.9584)$	$(0.9394; 0.9460; 0.9426)$
mice_pmm	$(0.9354; 0.9506; 0.9552)$	$(0.9538; 0.9582; 0.9604)$	$(0.9428; 0.9448; 0.9460)$
mice_norm	$(0.9364; 0.9540; 0.9558)$	$(0.9554; 0.9618; 0.9614)$	$(0.9464; 0.9480; 0.9464)$
mice_rf	$(0.9394; 0.9524; 0.9558)$	$(0.9582; 0.9598; 0.9604)$	$(0.9480; 0.9440; 0.9434)$
gbm	$(0.9266; 0.9518; 0.9520)$	$(0.9490; 0.9598; 0.9588)$	$(0.9366; 0.9442; 0.9420)$
xgboost	$(0.9444; 0.9470; 0.9554)$	$(0.9612; 0.9532; 0.9600)$	$(0.9518; 0.9392; 0.9468)$