Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 17;2022:9289574. doi: 10.1155/2022/9289574

Table 1.

Average evaluations values of unsupervised performance measurement using the proposed mean estimation techniques compared with the classical mean or Gaussian distribution for MCET.

μ 1,  μ2 estimation MRI Alzheimer's Skin lesion MRI brain
1 Classical mean 0.8841 0.8703 0.8406
2 Lognormal [6] 0.8796 0.8860 0.8479
3 Harmonic 0.8902 0.8697 0.8440
4 Geometric 0.8722 0.8376 0.8513

5 Contraharmonic Q = −3.0 0.8893 0.8446 0.8549
6 Q = −1.0 0.8943 0.8697 0.8440
7 Q = −0.5 0.8971 0.8669 0.8512
8 Q = 0.0 0.8703 0.8702 0.8407
9 Q = 0.1 0.8887 0.8603 0.8449

10 Alpha trim d/2 = 10.0 0.8924 0.8714 0.8667
11 d/2 = 20.0 0.8971 0.8727 0.8830
12 d/2 = 30.0 0.8987 0.8739 0.8942
13 d/2 = 40.0 0.8973 0.8795 0.8899
14 d/2 = 50.0 0.9046 0.8876 0.8779
15 d/2 = 55.0 0.8968 0.8917 0.8789
16 d/2 = 60.0 0.8922 0.8824 0.8777
17 d/2 = 65.0 0.8846 0.8721 0.8724
18 d/2 = 70.0 0.8928 0.8679 0.8782
29 d/2 = 80.0 0.8842 0.8692 0.8645
20 d/2 = 90.0 0.8831 0.8689 0.8633
21 d/2 = 100 0.8787 0.8632 0.8536
22 d/2 = 110 0.8755 0.8581 0.8534