Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 8;37(2):286–296. doi: 10.1007/s00455-021-10277-5

Table 7.

Comparison of calculated and weighted final scores between patients with eosinophilic esophagitis and nondysphagia controls for S-EEsAI and EORTC QLQ-OES18

Patients mean (SD) Nondysphagia control mean (SD) Fold change p valuea
S-EEsAI
 VDQ 12 (7.3) 0.87 (3.1) 14  < 0.001
 AMS 2.1 (5.6) 0.26 (2.5) 8.1  < 0.001
 Frequency 14 (11) 1.1 (3.9) 13  < 0.001
 Duration 0.37 (1.5) 0.0 (0.0) 0.013
 Pain 3.2 (6.2) 0.15 (1.5) 22  < 0.001
 PRO 32 (22) 2.4 (7.3) 13  < 0.001
EORTC QLQ-OES18
 Dysphagia 6.7 (11) 6.6 (23) 1.0 0.001
 Swallowing saliva 14 (27) 2.4 (13) 5.8  < 0.001
 Choking 20 (28) 4.8 (12) 4.2  < 0.001
 Eating 18 (21) 1.8 (5.1) 10  < 0.001
 Dry mouth 16 (26) 6.5 (14) 2.5 0.0049
 Taste 1.7 (7.3) 1.0 (7.6) 1.7 0.26
 Cough 13 (22) 6.8 (16) 1.9 0.020
 Speech 4.4 (13) 1.0 (5.7) 4.4 0.026
 Reflux 18 (22) 7.2 (15) 2.5  < 0.001
 Pain 12 (14) 3.2 (6.4) 3.8  < 0.001

AMS avoidance, modification and slow eating score; Duration duration of trouble swallowing; EORTC QLQ-OES18 European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Oesophageal Module 18; Frequency frequency of trouble swallowing; Pain pain when swallowing; PRO patient-reported outcome score; SD standard deviation; S-EEsAI Swedish Eosinophilic Esophagitis Activity Index; VDQ visual dysphagia question

S-EEsAI calculated scores: VDQ: 0–23; AMS: 0–25; Frequency: 0–31; Duration: 0–6; Pain: 0–15; PRO: 0–100 [15]. Each of the EORTC QLQ-OES18 domains are scored from 0 to 100 [10]

aMann–Whitney U test