Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 15;19(6):3489. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19063489

Table 2.

Implementation factors related to SBMHS.

CFIR Domains All
Studies
n = 38
Universal
Interventions
n = 17
Selective
Interventions
n = 7
Indicated
Interventions
n = 14
  • I.

    INTERVENTION CHARACTERISTICS

47 17 8 22
Intervention Source - - - -
Evidence Strength and Quality 3 - 2 1
Relative Advantage 2 1 - 1
Adaptability 11 2 2 7
Trialability 3 1 - 2
Complexity 2 2 - -
Design Quality and Packaging 19 9 2 8
Cost 7 2 2 3
  • II.

    OUTER SETTING

19 9 2 8
Patient Needs and Resources 1 - - 1
Cosmopolitanism 6 3 1 2
Peer Pressure 2 - 1 1
External Policy and Incentives 10 6 - 4
  • III.

    INNER SETTING

62 30 12 20
Structural Characteristics 4 1 2 1
Networks and Communications 17 9 3 5
Culture 6 4 1 1
Implementation Climate - - - -
  • -

    Tension for Change

- - - -
  • -

    Compatibility

2 1 - 1
  • -

    Relative Priority

4 2 1 1
  • -

    Organizational Incentives

- - - -
  • -

    Goals and Feedback

9 4 2 3
  • -

    Learning Climate

- - - -
Readiness for Implementation - - - -
  • -

    Leadership Engagement

2 2 - -
  • -

    Available Resources

16 5 3 8
  • -

    Access to Information

2 2 - -
  • IV.

    INDIVIDUALS’ CHARACTERISTICS

11 2 3 5
Knowledge and Beliefs
About the Innovation
9 2 2 4
Self-Efficacy - - - -
Individual Stage of Change - - - -
Individual Identification
with Organization
- - - -
Other Personal Attributes 2 - 1 1
  • V.

    PROCESS

40 20 9 11
Planning 5 5 - -
Engaging - - - -
  • -

    Opinion Leaders

3 - 2 1
  • -

    Formally Appointed Internal Implementation Leaders

2 1 1 -
  • -

    Champions

- - - -
  • -

    External Change Agents

1 - 1 -
  • -

    Key Stakeholders

17 10 3 4
  • -

    Innovation Participants

9 3 2 4
Executing 1 - - 1
Reflecting and Evaluating 2 1 - 1