Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 15;19(6):3482. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19063482

Table 4.

Results of structural equation modeling.

Hypothesized Path Estimate S.E. t-Value Results
B Beta
H1 CW EU 0.033 0.044 0.046 0.731 Rejected
H2 BC EU 0.288 0.378 0.053 5.482 *** Accepted
H3 CC EU 0.174 0.204 0.053 3.300 *** Accepted
H4 CS EU 0.204 0.269 0.044 4.641 *** Accepted
H5a BC WLB 0.027 0.028 0.066 0.414 Rejected
H5b CW WLB 0.332 0.338 0.058 5.714 *** Accepted
H5c EU WLB 0.293 0.226 0.085 3.447 *** Accepted
H5d CC WLB 0.249 0.224 0.066 3.768 *** Accepted
H5e CS WLB 0.172 0.175 0.055 3.144 ** Accepted
H6a BC TI −0.476 −0.291 0.106 −4.469 *** Accepted
H6b CW TI −0.188 −0.116 0.099 −1.902 Rejected
H6c EU TI 0.031 0.014 0.137 0.223 Rejected
H6d CC TI −0.082 −0.045 0.109 −0.757 Rejected
H6e CS TI −0.492 −0.302 0.090 −5.474 *** Accepted
H7 WLB TI −0.327 −0.198 0.119 −2.746 ** Accepted

Note: S.E. = standard error; Chi-square = 763.949 (df = 384), p < 0.000, Chi-square/df = 1.989, NFI = 0.924, RFI = 0.914, IFI = 0.961, TLI = 0.955, CFI = 0.960, RMSEA = 0.059, SRMR = 0.047; ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.