Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 17;14(3):218. doi: 10.3390/toxins14030218

Table 3.

Recovery percentages (% ± SD) for atropine (At) and scopolamine (Sc) testing different amounts of thyme spiked with TAs at 0.01 µg/g under SLE * followed by dSPE or SPE, using different amounts of HMS or SBA-15-functionalized mesostructured silicas as sorbents.

Sample
(g)
Sorbent
(mg)
SBA-15-SO3 HMS-SO3
dSPE a SPE b dSPE a SPE b
At c Sc d At c Sc d At c Sc d At c Sc d
0.5 150 54 ± 2 37 ± 9 77 ± 3 61 ± 1 56 ± 2 49 ± 2 78 ± 2 74 ± 3
0.25 150 87 ± 8 73 ± 8 90 ± 3 88 ± 6 88 ± 8 79 ± 5 100 ± 3 98 ± 3
0.25 100 58 ± 0 43 ± 2 67 ± 3 48 ± 8 58 ± 10 47 ± 2 94 ± 3 82 ± 1
0.25 75 - - - - - - 101 ± 6 83 ± 4
0.25 50 - - - - - - 79 ± 7 64 ± 13

* SLE (solid–liquid extraction) conditions: 0.25 g thyme + 8 mL acidified water (pH 1.0, HCl), re-extraction with 1 mL of acidified water. a dSPE: dispersive solid phase extraction; for experimental conditions see Figure 3. b SPE: solid phase extraction; for experimental conditions see Figure 3. c At: atropine, recovery ± SD (%). d Sc: scopolamine, recovery ± SD (%)—not analysed.