Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 11;8(3):322–331. doi: 10.1021/acscentsci.1c01132

Table 1. Optimization of the Alkylation–Annulation Reactiona.

graphic file with name oc1c01132_0008.jpg

no. [TM]b (amt, mol %) additive (amt, equiv)c T (°C) solvent yield (%)
1 [Rh] (10)   60 MeCN  
2 [Ir] (10)   60 MeCN  
3 [Rh] (10) [Cu] (2) 60 MeCN 50
4 [Rh] (10) [Ag] (1) 60 MeCN  
5 [Ir] (10) [Cu] (2) 60 MeCN 50
6 [Ir] (10) [Ag] (1) 60 MeCN  
7 [Ir] (10) [Cu] (2) 40 MeCN 65
8 [Rh] (10) [Cu] (2) 40 MeCN 75
9 [Rh] (5) [Cu] (2) 25 MeCN 82
10 [Ir] (5) [Cu] (2) 25 MeCN 72
11 [Rh] (2.5) [Cu] (2) 25 MeCN 85
12 [Rh] (2.5) [Cu] (2) 25 EtOH  
13 [Rh] (2.5) [Cu] (2) 25 Acetone 52
14 [Rh] (2.5) [Cu] (2) 25 MeOH  
15 [Rh] (2.5) [Cu] (2) 25 THF 56
16 [Rh] (2.5) [Cu] (2) 25 DCE 48
a

Reactions were conducted on a 20 mg scale in 1 mL of the solvent in a glass vial sealed with a screw cap.

b

Definitions: [Rh], [RhCp*Cl2]2; [Ir] = [IrCp*Cl2]2.

c

Definitions: [Cu], Cu(OAc)2·H2O; [Ag] = AgOAc.