Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 24;8(5):706–714. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.0122

Table 2. Efficacy of Study Treatment.

End point Paclitaxel, cisplatin, and capecitabine (n = 118) Cisplatin and fluorouracil (n = 120) HR (95% CI)a
Failure-free survival
Recurrence or death events, No. (%) 22 (18.6) 41 (34.2)
Rate at 3 y, % (95% CI) 83.5 (77.0-90.6) 68.9 (61.1-77.8) 0.47 (0.28-0.79)
Distant metastasis–free survival
Distant metastasis, No. (%) 12 (10.2) 23 (19.2)
Rate at 3 y, % (95% CI) 91.4 (86.4-96.6) 80.4 (73.6-87.9) 0.49 (0.24-0.98)
Locoregional relapse–free survival
Locoregional relapse events, No. (%) 8 (6.8) 18 (15.0)
Rate at 3 y, % (95% CI) 93.8 (89.5-98.4) 87.4 (81.4-93.8) 0.40 (0.18-0.93)
Overall survival
Death events, No. (%) 6 (5.1) 13 (10.8)
Rate at 3 y, % (95% CI) 94.7 (90.6-98.9) 88.9 (83.4-94.8) 0.45 (0.17-1.18)
Response to induction chemotherapy, No. (%)
Overall response 104 (88.1) 96 (80.0) NA
Complete response 2 (1.7) 4 (3.3) NA
Partial response 102 (86.4) 92 (76.7) NA
Stable disease 14 (11.9) 21 (17.5) NA
Not evaluable 0 3 (2.5) NA
Response to the whole treatment
Overall response 118 (100) 115 (95.8) NA
Complete response 111 (94.1) 102 (85.0) NA
Partial response 7 (5.9) 13 (10.8) NA
Stable disease 0 1 (0.8) NA
Not evaluable 0 4 (3.3) NA

Abbreviations: HR, hazard ratio; NA, not applicable.

a

Calculated using the stratified Cox proportional hazards regression model.