Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 17;14(3):220. doi: 10.3390/toxins14030220

Table 2.

Comparison of IC50 values and CR values of ZEN specific antibodies reported in previous literature.

References ZEN
Antibody
Coupling Method Immunoassay
Format
IC50 of ZEN (μg/L) CR (%) a
α-ZAL β-ZAL α-ZOL β-ZOL ZON
This study ZEN mAb 2B6 AGA icELISA b 10.38 1.52 1.28 2.64 1.83 4.27
ZEN mAb 1A10 AD icELISA 19.87 6.71 6.64 11.25 8.16 19.12
Sun et al. (2014) [20] ZEN mAb 4A3-F9 BDE icELISA 1.115 3.854 1.709 2.499 2.800 53.121
Dong et al. (2018) [21] ZEN mAb 6C2 OAE icELISA 0.114 89.48 39.26 99.22 55.45 44.34
Burmistrova et al. (2009) [23] ZEN mAb 2D8 OAE dcELISA c 0.8 69 <1 42 <1 22
Liu et al. (2015) [22] ZEN mAb 7B2 OAE BA-ELISA d 0.18 46.7 39.2 60.5 24.7 59.5
Burkin et al. (2002) [24] ZEN pAb FA icELISA 31.7 0.12 - 0.15 0.02 -
Gao et al. (2012) [25] ZEN pAb FA icELISA 233.35 2.25 5.65 3.14 1.96 6.79
ZEN mAb # FA icELISA 55.72 0.63 0.92 0.65 0.94 1.48
Teshima et al. (1990) [26] ZEN mAb 7-1-144 AGA icELISA 11.2 <0.1 <0.1 0.9 <0.1 4.0

Note. a The data were calculated using the CR values of ZEN as 100%. b icELISA: indirect competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. c dcELISA: direct competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. d BA-ELISA: biotin-streptavidin amplified enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. - No data. #: unnamed.