Table 5.
Linear Regression Analysis examining the influence of the materialism on flow proneness.
| t | p | β | F | df | p | R 2 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model 1 | 5.83 | 4, 1992 | <0.001 | 0.01 | |||
| Gender (0 = male, 1 = female) | 0.21 | 0.84 | 0.01 | ||||
| Age | 3.40 | 0.00 | 0.08 | ||||
| Education qualification level | 0.37 | 0.71 | 0.01 | ||||
| Socioeconomic status 1 | −2.11 | 0.04 | −0.05 | ||||
| Model 2 | 11.95 | 5, 1991 | <0.001 | 0.03 | |||
| Gender (0 = male, 1 = female) |
−0.02 | 0.99 | 0.00 | ||||
| Age | 1.79 | 0.07 | 0.04 | ||||
| Education qualification level | −0.08 | 0.94 | −0.00 | ||||
| Socioeconomic status 1 | −2.12 | 0.03 | −0.05 | ||||
| Materialistic values | −6.00 | 0.00 | −0.14 |
1 Socioeconomic status was measured by asking participants to indicate the profession of the chief income earner in their household. Lower scores indicated a higher level of profession.