Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 25;22:135. doi: 10.1186/s12876-022-02210-3

Table 3.

Prognostic factors of OS

Univariable Multivariable
HR 95% CI p-value aHR 95% CI p-value
Age > 60 yr 0.78 0.57–1.07 0.125
Male 1.04 0.63–1.72 0.886
PIVKA II > 250 mAU/mL 1.77 1.27–2.46 0.001
AFP > 200 ng/mL 2.11 1.54–2.89  < 0.001 1.73 1.23–2.45 0.002
Total bilirubin 1.20 1.11–1.29  < 0.001 1.18 1.09–1.29  < 0.001
Albumin 0.62 0.47–0.82 0.001
ALT 1.01 1.00–1.01 0.003 1.00 1.00–1.01 0.039
AST 1.00 1.00–1.01  < 0.001
PT 2.29 1.40–3.74 0.001
Presence of ascites 1.97 1.41–2.77  < 0.001
ECOG 1 (vs 0) 2.09 1.50–2.90  < 0.001 1.98 1.41–2.77  < 0.001
Child B, C (vs A) 1.88 1.32–2.66  < 0.001
BCLC stage C, D (vs B) 1.72 1.03–2.89 0.039 1.77 1.01–3.10 0.045
Tumor size 1.01 1.01–1.01  < 0.001 1.01 1.00–1.01  < 0.001
Extrahepatic metastasis 0.96 0.69–1.33 0.809
Portal vein thrombosis 1.53 1.13–2.09 0.007
Biliary invasion 1.44 0.80–2.60 0.223
Lenvatinib (vs sorafenib) 1.41 0.96–2.08 0.077 1.36 0.89–2.07 0.154
Previous anti-HCC treatment 0.46 0.31–0.68  < 0.001

Multivariable analysis was performed using variables with p value under 0.05 at univariable analysis

HR, hazard ratio; aHR, adjusted hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; PIVKA, protein induced by vitamin K absence or antagonists-II; AFP, alpha-fetoprotein; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; PT, prothrombin time; ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; BCLC, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer